Sting Video: Planned Parenthood busted offering advice to pimps, fails to alert authorities

Well, what do you know?



I didn’t know Planned Parenthood had so much in common with ACORN. But, I forget their both Liberal organizations that really look out for people in need.



Hot Air reports Live Action released another undercover expose of Planned Parenthood today, this time at the Perth Amboy, New Jersey clinic.



Posing as a pimp and a prostitute, the pair asked the PP manager how best to avoid legal consequences while getting prostitutes as young as 14 and 15 abortions and tests for STDs.



Legally, PP has to report any instances of underage girls being sexually exploited, but Amy Woodruff instead tells the two undercover reporters how to lie to avoid detection — and gives them the address of a clinic to get abortions where auditors don’t check records:





A Planned Parenthood manager in New Jersey coaches a man and a woman posing as sex traffickers how to to secure secret abortions, STD testing, and contraception for their female underage sex slaves, and make their whole operation “look as legit as possible” in an undercover video released this morning.



Clinic manager Amy Woodruff, LPN, of Planned Parenthood Central New Jersey’s Perth Amboy center, warns the pimp and his prostitute to have their trafficked underage girls lie about their age to avoid mandatory reporting laws, promising, “even if they lie, just say, ‘Oh he’s the same age as me, 15,’…it’s just that mainly 14 and under we have to, doesn’t matter if their partner’s the same age, younger, whatever, 14 and under we have to report.” She says, “For the most part, we want as little information as possible.”



Woodruff also recommends how the pimp can get his prostitutes cheaper contraception by claiming they are “students”: “If they’re minors, put down that they’re students. Yeah, just kind of play along that they’re students–we want to make it look as legit as possible.”



More details here



Memeorandum

PC infected Navy Brass recommends discharge for Capt Owen Honors for so-called homophic lewd videos

So this is what our mighty Navy has come to, a collection of politically correct knee jerkers.

Or maybe just plain jerks?

As you might recall, the Navy had a hissy fit 4 years after the fact in the wake of the repeal of DADT when comedy videos produced by Executive Officer Owen Honors hit the public airwaves.

Some of the footage contained remarks that might be offensive to homosexuals. And of course homosexuals can now serve openly in our armed forces and take a bullet for their country. But, it’s apparently forbidden to poke jokes at them because they need extra protection for their feelings.

Or at least today’s PC conscience Navy seems to think so.

CBS News reports that the admiral conducting the investigation into the raunchy videos shown to the crew of the aircraft carrier Enterprise has recommended that Captain Owen Honors, who as the ship's executive officer, produced and starred in the videos, be discharged from the Navy.

Earlier, Honors had been relieved of his command, but this would kick him out of the Navy.

Navy Captain Owen Honors' Lewd VideosNavy Ship Videos Probe Could Hit Higher-Ups

Honors has a right to show cause why he should not be kicked out. He has submitted a 15-page written statement claiming that the videos were known and even tacitly encouraged by his superior officers.

His attorney, Charles Gittens, has been quoted as saying that the videos were not inappropriate by the standards that existed aboard Navy ships at the time they were shown in 2006 and 2007, and that they conveyed important safety messages to the crew.

The investigation, which will also decide what action to take against other senior officers who knew about the videos, is expected to be completed this week.

Bombshell Report: Mets owners in much worse financial shape than claimed

This article in the New York Post has uncovered that Fred and Jeff Wilpon are in a much greater financial bind than they said last week.



As a Mets fan for nearly 40 years, I have learned to never take the Wilpons at their word. If its true that the Mets are 700 million dollars in debt, then the Wilpons may indeed be trying to sell the Mets outright at the highest possible price.



May only wish is that the next owner has extremely deep pockets and would refuse to play second fiddle to the Yankees.



That would be a Mets fans dream.



The New York Post reports that the New York Mets owners are in a much tighter squeeze than they are letting on, The Post has learned, and they may be forced to sell a controlling stake in the team.



Fred Wilpon and his ownership team have been shopping a minority stake in the Amazin's to Wall Street titans and other deep-pocketed investors for at least three months, said a source who was approached.



Potential investors stand to get little or no say over the team, despite the high debt load and hefty asking price. "Why would I put up a couple hundred million and get no rights?" said one prospective buyer who passed on the offer.



Wilpon said Friday in a conference call announcing that the owners were seeking to sell a 20 to 25 percent stake that "it is prudent for us to explore our options at this point," implying that the process had just begun. In reality, the process has been going on for months, sources told The Post.



The team, owned by Sterling Equities, which is controlled by Wilpon and his son, Jeff, is worth between $750 million and $1 billion, once source said.



Forbes last year pegged the value at $858 million.



But the team has roughly $700 million of debt, and that should be subtracted from the valuation when calculating what an owner's stake is worth, sources said. Using the $858 million valuation and the $700 million in debt, a 25 percent stake in the free equity amounts to just $39.5 million -- not the $200 million asking price.



While Sterling's 60 percent stake in its cable network, SportsNet New York, could be worth hundreds of millions, it cannot be used to attract minority investors to the team, sources said.



Sterling would have to distribute any proceeds from the sale of its SNY stake to lenders under the terms of their credit agreement, according to three sources close to the situation.



Also, it cannot borrow any more against the team or SNY under the loan agreements, said a source with direct knowledge of the team's finances. The Wilpon family already raised more than $200 million this summer by borrowing against the Mets and SNY, sources said.



The Wilpons have been trying to replace roughly $750 million they lost by investing with convicted Ponzi schemer Bernie Madoff, a source said. In addition, they are now in settlement talks with Irving Picard, the trustee for the Madoff estate, who claims Sterling is a "net winner" that withdrew $48 million more from two Madoff funds than it invested.



Looking to raise several hundred million but hemmed in by debt, the Wilpons may be forced to sell a larger stake than they wish.



"If they can't find a buyer, they will need to sell a majority stake six months from now," said a source.



The Mets declined comment.